American Journal of Health Studies https://www.amjhealthstudies.com/index.php/ajhs <p>Welcome to the <em>American Journal of Health Studies</em>. The <em>Journal</em> presents contemporary issues on health promotion and disease prevention themes through the publication of feature and research articles, systematic reviews, lessons learned reports, research briefs, and commentaries. <em>American Journal of Health Studies</em> supports the philosophy that health promotion, in its broadest sense, is multidimensional and includes intervention, policy, social support, and environmental support components. The Journal focuses on health topics for prevention and health promotion related to chronic disease/interventions, physical exercise/fitness, community health, nutrition and wellness themes.</p> en-US <p>Assignment of copyright</p> <p>In order to publish in the American Journal of Health Studies, authors must assign the copyright to American Journal of Health Studies, CPHR Publishing (the Publisher) and distribution license and any tables, illustrations or other material submitted for publication as part of the manuscript (the “Article”).</p> <p>This assignment of rights means that I have granted to the Copyright Owner the exclusive right to publish and reproduce the Article, or any part of the Article, in print, electronic and all other media (whether now known or later developed), in any form, in all languages, throughout the world, for the full term of copyright, and the right to license others to do the same, effective when the Article is accepted for publication. This includes the right to enforce the rights granted hereunder against third parties.</p> <p>Regarding the final published portable document format (pdf) appearing online, authors may print it, share it with colleagues, and/or have it available for personal use and non-commercial research. However, due to copyright laws (copyright belonging to the publisher), authors may not use the pdf for profit, either directly or indirectly. Unauthorized use includes: (1) re-sale; (2) publication in other media (compilations, books, manuals, journals, and the like); (3) use for mass distribution by businesses, corporations or companies; (4) promotion of the funding for a study by any organization or group; (5) reproduction and distribution; (6) selling or licensing copies; or (7) posting on third-party websites such as Research Gate, a university repository website, personal website, or organizational website. Thus, the pdf only may be used by authors for personal and professional use, and NOT for mass distribution. Permissions for such use may be authorized under some circumstances by the publisher (American Journal of Health Studies, CPHR Publishing) if requested in writing, and may incur fee(s) to be determined solely by the publisher. One example of educational use is to place on library reserve as a reading for an online class, which upon the end of the class must be removed immediately.</p> <p>Publisher reserves the right to grant or refuse permission to third parties to republish all or part of the article or translations thereof. To republish, such third parties must obtain written permission from the Publisher. (This is in accordance with the Copyright Statute, United States Code, Title 17. Exception: If all authors were bona fide officers or employees of the U.S. Government at the time the paper was prepared, the work is a “work of the US Government” (prepared by an officer or employee of the US Government as part of official duties), and therefore is not subject to US copyright; such exception should be indicated on signature lines. If this work was prepared under US Government contract or grant, the US Government may reproduce, royalty-free, all or portions of this work and may authorize others to do so, for official US Government purposes only, if the US Government contract or grant so requires.</p> <p>I have participated in the conception and design of this work and in the writing of the manuscript and take public responsibility for it. Neither this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content under my authorship has been published, has been submitted for publication elsewhere, or will be submitted for publication elsewhere while under consideration by The Heart Surgery Forum, except as described in an attachment. I have reviewed this manuscript (original version) and approve its submission. If I am listed above as corresponding author, I will provide all authors with information regarding this manuscript and will obtain their approval before submitting any revision. I attest to the validity, accuracy, and legitimacy of the content of the manuscript and understand that Publisher assumes no responsibility for the validity, accuracy, and legitimacy of its content. I warrant that this manuscript is original with me and that I have full power to make this Agreement. I warrant that it contains no matter that is libelous or otherwise unlawful or that invades individual privacy or infringes any copyright or other proprietary right. I agree to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless of and from any claim made against Publisher that relates to or arises out of the publication of the manuscript and agree that this indemnification shall include payment of all costs and expenses relating to the defense of any such claim, including all reasonable attorney’s fees.</p> AJHSeditorial@gmail.com (Ben Pfeifer) support@amjhealthstudies.com (D Clark) Fri, 14 Aug 2026 15:09:14 +0000 OJS 3.2.1.1 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss 60 Blackout Rage Gallon (BORG): A Call For Action and Research on the Trendy Drink https://www.amjhealthstudies.com/index.php/ajhs/article/view/808 <p>“Blackout Rage Gallon” (known as BORG) is a trendy social drink among the nation’s college students. BORG is a drink that consists of water, liquor, flavorings, electrolytes, vitamin supplements, and / or caffeine that is mixed inside of a plastic gallon container and given a humorous name (usually a pun on the word BORG), which is written on the container. Although BORG is growing in popularity, including on social media, there is a relative lack of published research on the topic. Given the popularity of BORG, and how it is presented online as a harm reduction strategy, this paper serves as a call to campus health professionals to include BORG in health education materials, and also as a call for researchers to further explore BORG and its impact on students’ wellbeing.</p> Christopher Seitz Copyright (c) 2026 American Journal of Health Studies https://www.amjhealthstudies.com/index.php/ajhs/article/view/808 Fri, 14 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000 Determinants of Female College Students’ Likelihood of Accepting Self-sampling for Cervical Cancer Prevention https://www.amjhealthstudies.com/index.php/ajhs/article/view/747 <p>Cervical cancer screening (CCS) including Human Papillomavirus self-sampling test (HPVSST) offers opportunities for the early detection of malignancy or lesions before onset of symptoms when treatment of cancer is most effective. Self-sampling can increase CCS in college students, however, female students’ attitudes toward HPVSST are understudied. Guided by the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB), we examined associations between psychosocial factors (attitude, subjective norm, perceived control) and college students’ likelihood of accepting self-sampling. Participants in survey group 1 (n=158) were not shown pictures of HPVSST materials before completing the survey and another group of participants in survey group 2 (n=159) completed the survey were shown an image of the materials. Independent variables included attitudes, subjective norms, perceived control and knowledge. Dependent variable was intention<br />for self-sampling. Multiple linear regression models and independent samples t-tests were used to analyze data. Women’s attitudes and perceived control were significantly associated with intention for self-sampling (p &lt; 0.001) accounting for 51.5% of the variance in survey group 1 (Adjusted R<sup>2</sup> =.515) and 48.7% of the variance in survey group 2 (Adjusted R<sup>2</sup> =.487). Women who completed the survey without seeing HPVSST materials had significantly higher intention for accepting self-sampling than those who saw the pictures (M=8.02). Positive attitude, subjective norm, and knowledge were also significantly higher in the group who completed the survey without seeing the material (p &lt; 0.001). Attitude and perceived control predict the likelihood of college women’s acceptance of HPV self-sampling, and future interventions can target those psychosocial factors.</p> Anjelica Elizondo, Matt Asare, Cheyenne Dixon Copyright (c) 2026 American Journal of Health Studies https://www.amjhealthstudies.com/index.php/ajhs/article/view/747 Fri, 14 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000 Exploring the Health Beliefs of Older African Americans in a Faith-Based Health Education Program https://www.amjhealthstudies.com/index.php/ajhs/article/view/772 <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Medical mistrust among African Americans is rooted in a history of abuse by unethical researcher and personal and community experiences of discrimination in healthcare. This study explored the relationship between spirituality and health, and health care attitudes of older African Americans in a faith-based health education program in the northeastern United States.</span><span style="font-weight: 400;"> The Health Beliefs survey includes combined items from the Spiritual Locus of Control Scale and the Group-Based Medical Mistrust Scale. We collected data over four years of a faith-based dementia caregiver support program from new participants (N=56) in an annual 12-week Healthy Living program. Participants completed the survey during their first session in their first year of the program. This exploratory study analyzed survey responses using univariate statistics.</span><span style="font-weight: 400;"> Participants endorsed the importance of their relationship with God in staying healthy and reliance on God to remain in good health and showed more trust than distrust in the healthcare system. </span><span style="font-weight: 400;">Results indicate a cultural shift in this community of older African Americans resulting from repeated exposure to messaging on self-advocacy in healthcare settings, importance of preventive screenings, and decreasing health risks through positive health practices. </span><span style="font-weight: 400;">Health education programs must be designed to provide repeated health messaging stressing the importance of personal responsibility for adopting positive health practices, self-advocacy in healthcare settings, and active participation in the patient-provider partnership.</span></p> Maria Brown, Luvenia Cowart Copyright (c) 2026 American Journal of Health Studies https://www.amjhealthstudies.com/index.php/ajhs/article/view/772 Fri, 14 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000 Physical Attractiveness, Occupational Status, and Gender https://www.amjhealthstudies.com/index.php/ajhs/article/view/780 <div>Sexual behavior and relationship preferences among emerging adults are shaped by sociocultural cues such as physical attractiveness and occupational status, which interact with gender norms to influence decision-making. This study examined how perceived partner attractiveness and occupational status affect college students’ willingness to engage in sexual behaviors and their relationship preferences, with attention to gender differences. A cross-sectional sample of 285 undergraduate students viewed standardized photographs depicting individuals varying in attractiveness (high vs low) and occupational status (surgeon vs dishwasher). Participants rated their willingness to engage in five sexual behaviors and indicated preferred relationship types. Composite scores were analyzed using one-way ANOVA, and relationship preferences were examined using chi-square analyses. Results indicated that both attractiveness and occupational status significantly influenced sexual willingness and relationship preferences. Participants reported greater willingness to engage in sexual behaviors with attractive, high-status individuals, with moderate to large effect sizes (η² = .18-.36, p &lt; .001). Notable sex differences emerged, with women demonstrating greater selectivity and reduced willingness toward unattractive or low-status partners, while men reported relatively higher willingness across all conditions (p &lt; .05). Women were also more likely to prefer long-term relationships with high-status partners, whereas men showed a stronger preference for short-term relationships (p &lt; .01). These findings highlight the role of perceived partner characteristics and gender norms in shaping sexual decision-making among emerging adults, suggesting that sexual health education should address social perceptions and relational dynamics alongside risk prevention.</div> Tina Penhollow, Michael Young Copyright (c) 2026 American Journal of Health Studies https://www.amjhealthstudies.com/index.php/ajhs/article/view/780 Fri, 14 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000